Jamie Lee Curtis slammed for disturbing photo of naked girl in box on display in her home… releases remorseless statement. – The Informant



Jamie Lee Curtis slammed for disturbing photo of naked girl in box on display in her home… releases remorseless statement.

Published on 22.1.2023


Actress Jamie Lee Curtis is currently the subject of controversy due to a disturbing photo hanging on her wall.

Curtis, 64, posted an image of her office on Instagram and Facebook with the intention of showing off the “Pollack chairs” she got on the set of one of her recent films, Everything Everywhere all at Once.

The caption to her post read, “Okay. This is a weird post. But I have a Covid, so too bad. During one of the SAG nominating panels for [Everything Everywhere all at Once], I told how I ended up with my office furnished with the magnificent Pollack chairs from this film. I mentioned that if people follow me it’s not a low end gimmick to try and get my numbers up, but I couldn’t find any other way to spread the image to the world, than I’ll post a picture of them on my IG in my offices for [Comet Pictures] and I’m a truth-teller so here goes. »

Tendency : France: Listen, Alexander Makogonov, spokesperson for the Russian Embassy in France.

Curtis posted the photo with the intention of emphasizing the chairs. However, people were more interested in what hung on the wall behind the chairs.

On the wall is a photo of a naked child, locked in a small box.

This bizarre image quickly caught people’s attention, prompting many questions and criticisms of Jamie Lee Curtis.

Translation of the tweet:

Why does Jamie Lee Curtis have a painting of a naked child packaged in a box hanging on his wall? She deleted this board shortly after posting it.

Translation of the tweet:

Of ALL the paintings you can have in your home…why does Jamie Lee Curtis have this one?

Maybe someone can enlighten me on this “art”?

Radio host Stew Peters compared Curtis to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein who owned explicit art.

“Why does Jamie Lee Curtis have a picture of a naked child stuffed in a suitcase on his wall? “. Peters asked. “High vibes from Epstein. »

Translation of the tweet:

Why does Jamie Lee Curtis have a photo of a naked child in a suitcase on her wall?

Strong Epstein vibes.

Referring to the Liberals’ current fight against gas stoves, one Twitter user said: ‘You know we have a serious problem when Liberals are more offended by my gas stove, but not by the fact that [Jamie Lee Curtis] has a framed photo of a naked girl stuffed in the storage bin hanging on her wall. It’s a war of souls. »

Translation of the tweet:

You know we have a serious problem when liberals are more offended by my gas stove, but not by the fact that @jamieleecurtis has a framed photo of a naked girl stuffed in the storage bin hanging on her wall. It’s a war of souls 🙏🏻

After receiving widespread criticism for the post, Curtis removed it from his social media accounts and released a statement about the “artwork”.

“Last week I posted a photo of some chairs that had a photograph of an artist given to me 20 years ago on the wall. I understand that this has bothered some people. Like I said, I’m a truth teller, so here’s the truth. This is the photo of a child, taken by her mother, who is playing in her garden in a bathtub. Nothing more, nothing less. I took down the post because I didn’t want to keep something upsetting for everyone.

In a way, this statement was meant to make the photo less creepy and inappropriate. This is not the case.

Author Lucy Riles commented on Curtis’ statement, noting some important information that Curtis omitted.

Riles wrote: “Correction: This is a photo of a NUDE girl,” pointing out that Curtis intentionally avoided this disturbing aspect of the photograph.

The second correction noted by Riles is that the photo “was taken by photographer Betsy Schneider.”

Riles then posed some important questions to Curtis. She asked him, “How come you don’t mind?” … How can that not upset you? ! … You removed the post, but did you remove the painting? ! “.

“Her sly statement makes it clear that she has no remorse or wrongdoing…Gaslighting those who see this as child exploitation as their problem…not hers,” Riles continued. “Typical Hollywood elite…reminds me of Kim’s devious response to Balenciaga.”

Political commentator Paul Joseph Watson also criticized Curtis’ statement, saying sarcastically, “Well, that explains it all then. Totally normal. »

Translation of the tweet:

Jamie Lee Curtis clarifies THIS artwork on his wall by revealing that it is an image of a naked child taken by the child’s mother ‘playing’ in a tub of water, which was then gifted to Curtis .

That explains everything. Totally normal. I prefer landscapes.🥴





Source link

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Telegram

A to Z : Alien Races

Get your Ebook and learn everything about the alien races in the Univers.

GESARA • Redemption E-Book

Get your Ebook and learn everything about the redemption and Gesara.
Translate »