A major public media publishes a negative review of a conservative documentary… The producer has proof that they watched it at 0%.
Published on 12.6.2022
The Rolling Stone magazine editor wrote an incriminating article about “What is a Woman” without ever looking at it.
Another leftist hack for a leftist rag magazine has been exposed.
Matt Walsh’s hit documentary “What is a Woman” had leftists screaming even before its release. Its success with open-minded, rational viewers is beyond reproach, but leftist critics in the mainstream media have thrown as much mud at this documentary as possible…sometimes without even seeing it.
Rolling Stone magazine editor Moises Fenty, who wrote a negative review of “What is a Woman” calling it “hateful”, “transphobic” and “dehumanizing”, apparently watched exactly 0% of the documentary before write his review and Matt Walsh has the proof.
According to the tweet above, precisely 0% of the film was watched by Fenty before he wrote his ‘review’ (read: indictment).
The editor, Liz Garber-Paul, had the credit of watching 11% of the film before approving the article.
11% of a reality check is apparently all a rabid liberal can take before pulling out his dictionary of bigotry and starting labeling you.
While “What’s a Woman” is a really interesting documentary that explores different cultural conceptions of gender and determines that it’s nowhere near as fluid as liberals make it out to be, all the mainstream media audiences seem to argue about this successful report is that it’s somehow “hateful” and “bigoted” because it doesn’t reinforce their delusional worldview.
If the mainstream media and leftist elite oppose something so fervently, you know it must be on the right track.